Week4: Lingering Questions

-

 * How can a badge system be integrated into K-12 education? Are there any more examples around the world?

* How can tagging improve one's learning performance? If we were to design an experiment, what would be the mediating variable or a conceptual framework?

* How do Korean teachers feel about i-Scream? Do they think it's helping them or making them less professional?

Comments

  1. Brett F. June 11, 2023 at 9:55 AM

    Hi Chaewon, what is i-scream?

    For your first question, many classrooms have a fake currency or rewards system built in throughout the year or years. Generally as incentives for positive behaviors. A criminal justice class I work with has different types of badges as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChaewonJune 14, 2023 at 11:57 AM

      Hi Brett! Thanks for your comment. By the badge system I mentioned in the question, I meant something bigger like the one associated with college credits. Also, I discussed about i-Scream in my week3 reading reflection I think. Please check it out if you're interested!

      Delete
  2. Medic 2023June 11, 2023 at 8:18 PM

    For the younger ages, I think that a badge system is already in place, or at least it was for me when I was younger and one is still in place now with my children and dare I say grandchildren. When kids did good work they got a "gold star" or a "smiley face" on their paper. I remember counting how many I could get in one week. At least that is my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChaewonJune 14, 2023 at 11:58 AM

      Hi! That's correct, so badges are the representative system of behaviorism for extrinsic motivation I think. But last week, we learned badges can be more than that. I guess I was wondering how badge systems can serve other roles besides motivating students in K-12 education. Thanks for your comment!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week5: Discussion Reflection

-
 I think this course really reminds me how it was like working as a teacher back in Korea. I'd like to mention some of my experiences with the topic in this post. But before I start, I want to note that I really like Brett and Shiyao's opinion about privacy: " When a product is free, you as the user are the product.", " In the era of Web 2.0, if I'm not paying for a product (social media), then I am the product. " I totally agree.     But what stroke me the most in this week's discussion was topic 2, the ethical concerns for educators. It was surprising to see my classmates more worried about students' privacy being invaded by educators. It's the opposite in Korea. For example, Korean parents tend to think that the teachers are not sincere enough if they are reluctant to share their phone numbers with the parents in their class. They think they should be able to contact the teacher anytime (literally anytime, even during weekends and at night...
Read more

Week2: Discussion Reflection

-
     I went through this week's discussion topics and here is what I thought about so far.     First of all, I think Web 2.0 helps people learn, although I'm still not sure about social media's educational affordance. Good examples can be found in coding/programming topics. There are so many welcoming communities in that area full of people eager to share their knowledge about how to code or debug. You can easily get an essential piece of information to get through an obstacle you bumped into while programming, which will be very hard if you only try to solve it with published knowledge, such as books. Also, I'd like to note that lurking is definitely an act of learning, although it does not directly contribute to the community.     Among the comments, Bobbi's comment reminded me of what I believed as a teacher. So, people say the younger generation is born with the Internet at the tip of their fingers, calling them 'digital natives'. Does that mean th...
Read more